Archive for the ‘Obama’ Category

A Rabbi, Obama, Iran, oh my!

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009
jewish-rabbi

Rabbi David Louis

I should issue a disclaimer up front since this blog title belies what follows.  It’s not a concise entry of a particular rabbi commenting on Iran and Obama.  It’s actually a jumble of so many things I have wanted to write about the past few weeks and yet have not.  (Blame it on grading finals, summer travels, camping, insert excuse of your choice.)

There are so many interesting developments on Middle East issues right now that reducing them to pithy blog entries seems beyond challenging.  Does anyone else sense that major shifts are emerging?  It seems we are headed toward a basis of reconciliation rather than divisions, building on mutual understandings rather than assumptions and prejudices, and focusing more on the underlying principles of democracy and of the Golden Rule.

In that vein, and in forgiveness of the fact that I’m sitting in a San Francisco coffee shop about to rush off on another adventure, I’ll give you a smattering of things that have been on my radar screen the past few weeks.  (And with the hopes that I will return to flesh these out in the next few days—insha’allah!)

Two days ago, I attended a Bible conference at Asilomar, to which I travelled, interestingly enough, to hear a Rabbi.  (Bible conference – Rabbi–get the irony?)  I had the opportunity have lunch with him, Rabbi David Louis, and hear him speak.  A remarkable, spell-binding, inspiring, ground-breaking figure.  I had chills and was moved beyond words.  He is a deep, spiritual, loving character, working for unity between Jews and Christians on the basis of metaphysics.  He “gets” it at the deepest level and sees beyond human divisions.  Here are a few links:

–Rabbi Louis article and video interview on Christian Science.

Another major development–a true stake in the ground–was President Obama’s speech in Cairo on June 4.  I hope that everyone gets the chance to listen or read it.  His comments address head-on issues and challenges I heard so often from individuals in the Middle East.  Obama appeals to the better part of each of us–individuals in both regions–to move forward on the basis of the fundamental principles of decency that unite all mankind.  It’s a watershed speech, and truly lays the groundwork for a new chapter in this most contentious and fragile relationship in the world–that of Middle East and West.

Cairo speech text and video

Thirdly, unfolding events in Iran have held the world audience captive, andshow how pervasive is the Iranian public’s disaffection with the country’s political and economic troubles.  I’ve found NYT’s constantly updated Iran news page convenient in staying abreast of what’s happening.

Finally, Frontline last night aired a wonderful program, Egypt: Middle East, Inc.

It follows a competition for young entrepreneurs sponsored by an organization, INJAZ, I encountered at last year’s Middle East World Economic Forum in Cairo.  They are doing wonderful things and PBS’s production is very well done.  Check it out!

Well folks, that’s all for now.  Warm greetings to all and wishing you a wonderful summer!

A very different inauguration

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009



The last change of administration I was on the Mall in Washington, DC, watching Bush get sworn in first-hand. The weather was miserable–freezing rain, icy cold. I had just moved to Washington a couple weeks earlier from Northern California, after having completed graduate school at Stanford. It was a new era in Washington and in my life. I was in a brand new city; I had just started a new job with the government, and George Bush was now our president. Looking back at that day and the sense of excitement I felt about the future, nothing could have prepared me for what happened later that year, 9/11 and the subsequent eight years.

This inauguration day I watched the proceedings of the sunny, brisk day in Washington via big-screen TV, surrounded by my students in a hall at my alma mater, Principia College, where I now teach. It was a similar feeling of a new beginning but one grounded in a much more fervent hope, a deeper understanding of what is at stake, and a sense of my own role to play.

In class directly after President Obama’s speech, my students brought up their awe and pride in our country and in our new President. They remarked on Obama’s reaching out to others in a spirit of friendship, combined with his realistic acknowledgement of our own need for security–without “sacrificing our ideals”. The students mentioned Obama’s comfort with the old and the new–the timeless principles of truth espoused by our founding principles, our religious faiths–and his commensurate embracing of the new, the future, and of progress.

To me, Obama is the anti-fundamentalist, the bridger of gaps, the appreciator of both sides, the fearless moderate. I think our founding fathers would be smiling down on us today as we pledge as a nation to live up to their ideals of equality, justice, liberty, and freedom for all.

I’m sure many ages have hoped and aspired for the realization o these ideals. I know that eight years ago on the Mall I wished for these same things. This time it’s just that there are fewer storms and less freezing rain to cloud the path. It’s a clear day in Washington, after all.

Carter’s op-ed in WaPo, "Obama’s Human Rights Opportunity"

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

Carter is the man. He is one of my greatest heroes and I so hoped I would fatefully bump in to him during my trip to the Carter Center earlier this year in Atlanta, GA. Oh well. I at least proudly sport my Carter Center t-shirt and hat. Here’s a guy who took “retirement” to a whole new level, embarking on peace-keeping missions, democratic reforms, and health care worldwide. If you haven’t checked out his book Our Endangered Values: America’s Moral Crisis, it’s a must-read. And I’ve mentioned his Palestine, Peace not Apartheid book before.

Here is his latest op-ed in yesterday’s Washington Post, in which he takes his usual clear stand for our values over fear tactics in the name of “security”.

Obama’s Human Rights Opportunity
By Jimmy Carter
Wednesday, December 10, 2008; A25

The advancement of human rights around the world was a cornerstone of foreign policy and U.S. leadership for decades, until the attacks on our country on Sept. 11, 2001.

Since then, while Americans continue to espouse freedom and democracy, our government’s abusive practices have undermined struggles for freedom in many parts of the world. As the gross abuses at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo Bay were revealed, the United States lost its mantle as a champion of human rights, eliminating our national ability to speak credibly on the subject, let alone restrain or gain concessions from oppressors. Tragically, a global backlash against democracy and rights activists, who are now the targets of abuse, has followed.

The advancement of human rights and democracy is necessary for global stability and can be achieved only through the local, often heroic, efforts of individuals who speak out against injustice and oppression — endeavors the United States should lead, not impede. If the early warnings of human rights activists had been heeded and tough diplomacy and timely intervention mobilized, the horrific, and in some cases ongoing, violence in Bosnia, Rwanda, Sudan’s Darfur region and the Democratic Republic of the Congo might have been averted.

Today marks the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. With a new administration and a new vision coming to the White House, we have the opportunity to move boldly to restore the moral authority behind the worldwide human rights movement. But the first steps must be taken at home.

President-elect Barack Obama has pledged to shut down the detention facility at Guantanamo Bay and end torture, which can be accomplished by executive orders to close the prison and by enforcing existing prohibitions against torture by any U.S. representative, including FBI and CIA agents. The detention of people secretly or indefinitely and without due process must cease, and their cases should be transferred to our courts, which have proved their competence in trying those accused of terrorism. Further, a nonpartisan expert commission should be named to conduct a thorough review of U.S. practices related to unwarranted arrest, torture, secret detention, extraordinary rendition, abandonment of habeas corpus and related matters. Acknowledging to the world that the United States also has made mistakes will give credence to our becoming “a more perfect union” — a message that would resonate worldwide. Together, these actions will help us restore our nation’s principles and embolden others abroad who want higher moral standards for their own societies.

By putting its house in order, the United States would reclaim its moral authority and wield not only the political capital but also the credibility needed to engage in frank but respectful bilateral dialogues on the protection of human rights as central to world peace and prosperity. Human rights defenders around the world, whose annual conference began at the Carter Center this week, are eagerly awaiting the Obama administration. In Pakistan, they look for our help in restoring the rule of law that was undermined when the United States sided with Pervez Musharraf as he debilitated an independent-minded Supreme Court. Defenders of the struggling democratic movement in Egypt seek a tough U.S. stance supporting free and fair elections and ending the abuse of opposition political candidates. Throughout the Middle East, there is hope that the United States will move more aggressively and persistently to help orchestrate a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the prism through which the region measures the U.S. commitment to human rights.

In the war-ravaged Democratic Republic of the Congo, rights defenders under daily threat hope the United States will pressure its allies in Rwanda and Uganda to withdraw support from proxy forces that continue to wreak havoc there. All agree that the United States should reengage with agencies of the United Nations to make that body a more effective tool to protect human rights, knowing that this must be a global effort.

The moral footprint of the United States has always been vast. Our next president has an unprecedented opportunity to lead through example by inspiring and supporting those who would reach for freedom and by being tough and effective with those who would impede freedom’s march. All Americans must give him full support.

The writer, the 39th president, is founder of the Carter Center, a not-for-profit organization advancing peace and health worldwide.

"Why am I for Obama?" published in Iraqi news weekly

Monday, December 1st, 2008

Happy belated Thanksgiving to all! I just had an article published in Arabic in a leading Iraqi news weekly, called Al Esbuyia, or Iraq Weekly, entitled “Why am I for Obama”. Al Esbuyia recently made other news by publishing a political cartoon depicting female suicide bombers that provoked the ire of Iraqi parliamentarians.

Here’s the link to the article in Arabic, Why am I for Obama?, and the original pasted below in English. Unfortunately, I don’t think the poem made it through the final edit, but I thought I’d leave it here for you to read.

As the article points out, most Iraqis I knew supported McCain, and it was helpful to get this note back from an Iraqi friend after he read the article. “Your perspective gives me hope because I hoped McCain would win, but your article shows that Obama will understand Iraq better and hopefully help it while serving the American people. By the way, congratulations on such amazing elections and groundbreaking outcome.”

Why am I for Obama?

Unlike for Republican candidate John McCain, Iraq was never President-elect Barack Obama’s lodestar. Obama opposed the US invasion into Iraq in 2003 as well as the troop “surge” in 2007. Even during his campaign, Obama preferred to focus attention on what he considered the real fight in Afghanistan, from which Iraq was just a distraction, and a costly one at that. We “took our eye off the ball” with our myopic obsession of winning the war in Iraq at the expense of catching Osama Bin Ladin, Obama proclaimed in the first presidential debate with McCain.

Does Obama’s lackluster consideration of Iraq make Iraqis nervous? From my informal canvassing of my Iraqi acquaintances, it seemed to. Many preferred McCain because of what they perceived to be his iron-clad determination to stay put until democracy is shored and security restored.

But recent events seem to poke holes in my theory that Iraqis are wary of Obama. The Iraqi cabinet just signed the elusive security pact with the United States, in part because members believed that an Obama administration would actually respect the timetable because it more closely coincided with, and even elongated, his own stated plan of 16-months. There was some distrust as to whether a Republican administration would stick with the notion of pulling out of a country on which it had staked its entire foreign policy (not to mention its grand plans to remake the Middle East)—especially if that country were descending into chaos, disorder, and left an image of leaving with our tail between our legs. An opposition administration would have no problem deeming the whole operation a failure, proclaiming how badly the previous government screwed it up, and making a public vow that they never would have or never would in the future make such poor decisions.

It is true, however, that McCain had visited Iraq many times and took on the issue with much passion and fervor. One could say that he cared much more deeply about the situation in Iraq; he saw Iraqi success and security as inseparable from American success and security, versus Obama’s more flippant attitude. However, prioritization does not ensure right decision-making, or even intelligent policy. Obama, though less knowledgeable and experienced on Iraqi issues, is, as many pundits have pointed out, a very “quick study”, and very comfortable with nuance and complexity, without which one could not even hope to grasp the labyrinth of Iraqi politics and history. McCain, on the other hand, despite his experience, has often confused “Sunnis” and “Shias” and has been criticized as similar to President Bush in his tendency to avoid fine distinctions.

Another reason why Obama might be good for Iraq is his stated penchant for “talking” before fighting. This helps especially with Iran, whose Ahmedinejad already sent Obama a conciliatory overture in a letter of congratulations after his election. Obama’s election—and the prospect of a less hostile administration occupying its neighbor— also might have softened Iran’s opposition to Iraq’s security pact with the United States, according to political analysts. The notion a rising regional power and the world’s superpower engaging in more diplomatic exchanges rather than proxy wars inside Iraq is a heart-warming outlook for Iraqi security indeed.

It’s probably becoming clear where my biases lie, with my intent extolling of Obama’s virtues. But, in truth, I have two biases—I am staunchly pro-Iraq and pro-Obama, (and I’ve been pro-Iraq for longer). After witnessing (and sometimes participating) in the incredible mistakes committed during the first two years of the American program in Iraq, I believe the best thing for Iraq is to have an America in its midst that understands that it has taken a wrong turn somewhere in the past years and that change must happen. This view has been the mantra of Obama’s campaign. He has also stressed that we must not only talk about, but live up to, and act on our ideals, whether that involves repairing frayed friendships, talking to our enemies, closing an ignominy like Guantanamo prison, or leaving a country that asked us to.

Along with the prospect of a changed America that Obama brings with him, the election itself also brought home the example of something so wonderful about America that doesn’t change—the power of democracy. This month’s election showcased the peaceful transition of power and a transparent process that involved real choice, real accountability, and fairness. And the election of the first African-American candidate showed that anything is possible.

This thrilling election reminded me of another election just as powerful—in Iraq on January 30, 2005. At the polling center I visited that day and the Iraqis with whom I spoke, I saw the faces lit up with glee at the “feeling of freedom” and of the opportunity to have a personal say and stake in the future of their country. It was an incredibly moving sight to witness voters who were braving dire and grave terrorist threats to cast their ballots and demonstrate their freedom. As Iraq heads into this tense period before its upcoming provincial elections, I hope the recent American elections remind the Iraqi people of their own in 2005, during which Iraqis banded together to defeat fear, intimidation, and violence. You truly showed the world that anything was possible, and reminded us of that most powerful force—freedom. Allow me to share the poem I wrote on that day.

Badge of Honor

My finger is still purple,
My tears are still wet,
With the feeling of freedom.
My heart is overwhelmed by their joy,
Their hope, their courage.
I am humbled, bowed before them.
They are the lights shining in darkness.
They are the river, the lifeblood of the world!
This is their gift to us, their purpose.
They have not only changed themselves and their country.
Their fight is for the world,
Tipping the balance on the side of freedom.
What could express the depth of our gratitude?
They say we saved them from the maniacal regime;
We gave them democracy.
Little do they know they are giving it back to us,
Giving us their example of freedom from fear,
Of the rewards of courage.
True warriors,
Each ballot a sword brandished against evil,
Each purple finger a
Badge of honor.